Mechanisms controlling caffeine‐induced relaxation of coronary artery of the pig

Abstract

We studied the effects of caffeine on coronary artery smooth muscle of the pig by measuring changes in isometric tension, cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) and transmembrane potential. In the absence of tone, caffeine induced a concentration‐dependent transient contraction of coronary artery strips, followed by sustained relaxation. Simultaneously with the relaxation, caffeine, 25 mm, hyperpolarized the smooth muscle cells by 7.7 ± 0.9 mV. Caffeine caused a concentration‐dependent relaxation of strips precontracted with 10−5 m acetylcholine (ACh). A supramaximal relaxing concentration of 25 mm caffeine produced an additional transient increase in [Ca2+]i on the Ca2+ plateau of ACh tonic contraction, which was followed by a decrease in [Ca2+]i to a level slightly below the basal concentration. This relaxation was accompanied by a hyperpolarization of 7.3 ± 0.9 mV. KCl 120 mm (high K+) contracted the strips with a concomitant depolarization of 38.6 ± 1.6 mV and sustained increase in [Ca2+]i. Caffeine caused a concentration‐dependent relaxation of high K+‐induced contraction. Caffeine, 25 mm, decreased the Ca2+ plateau to a level that remained above the basal concentration of Ca2+ but did not change the membrane potential. When strips were placed in a Ca2+‐free medium with EGTA 2 mm and, in addition, ACh was applied successively three times, both intracellular and extracellular mobilizable Ca2+ pools were depleted. In these conditions, phorbol 12,13 dibutyrate (PDBu) 10−7 m and prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) 10−5 m contracted the strips. Caffeine (25 mm) inhibited these contractions with no change in [Ca2+]i. Forskolin, 3 × 10−7 m, inhibited ACh induced‐contraction but did not affect those induced by PDBu. In conclusion, these results show that caffeine has multiple cellular effects. During caffeine‐induced relaxation, [Ca2+]i, adenosine 3′: 5′‐cyclic monophosphate (cyclic AMP) content and membrane potential are modified. The findings suggest, however, that these effects are secondary, and that caffeine acts mainly by another unknown mechanism, possibly involving a direct inhibition of the contractile apparatus. 1991 British Pharmacological Society