Percutaneous intervention in ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: Culprit-only or complete revascularization?

4Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The best approach of multivessel coronary artery disease in the context of acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation and primary percutaneous coronary intervention is one of the main reasons for controversy in cardiology. Although the main global guidelines do not recommend routine complete revascularization in these patients, recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated benefit of this approach in reducing cardiovascular outcomes. For this reason, an adequate review of this evidence is essential in order to establish scientifically based strategy and achieve better outcomes for these patients who present with acute myocardial infarction. This review aims to present objectively the most recent evidence available on this topic.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Osório, A. P. S., de Quadros, A. S., Vieira, J. L. da C., & Portal, V. L. (2017, December 1). Percutaneous intervention in ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: Culprit-only or complete revascularization? Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170174

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free