Abstract
The use of generative design grammars for computational design synthesis has been shown to be successful in many application areas. The development of advanced search and optimization strategies to guide the computational synthesis process is an active research area with great improvements in the last decades. The development of the grammar rules, however, often resembles an art rather than a science. Poor grammars drive the need for problem specific and sophisticated search and optimization algorithms that guide the synthesis process toward valid and optimized designs in a reasonable amount of time. Instead of tuning search algorithms for inferior grammars, this research focuses on designing better grammars to not unnecessarily burden the search process. It presents a grammar rule analysis method to provide a more systematic development process for grammar rules. The goal of the grammar rule analysis method is to improve the quality of the rules and in turn have a major impact on the quality of the designs generated. Four different grammars for automated gearbox synthesis are used as a case study to validate the developed method and show its potential. Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Königseder, C., & Shea, K. (2014). Systematic rule analysis of generative design grammars. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM, 28(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060414000195
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.