Five-Year Outcomes of the POLARIX Study Comparing Pola-R-CHP and R-CHOP in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

  • Morschhauser F
  • Salles G
  • Sehn L
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the POLARIX study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03274492 ), polatuzumab vedotin plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (Pola-R-CHP) showed a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit versus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in patients with previously untreated intermediate- or high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; median follow-up: 28 months). In this 5-year update, sustained PFS benefits favoring Pola-R-CHP were observed. In the global intention-to-treat population (N = 879; median follow-up: 64.1 months), Pola-R-CHP demonstrated a significant PFS benefit over R-CHOP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97]), with 5-year PFS rates of 64.9% (95% CI, 59.8 to 70.0) and 59.1% (95% CI, 53.9 to 64.3), respectively. Although not statistically significant, overall survival analysis showed a HR of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.15) at the 5-year data cut compared with 0.94 (95% CI, 0.67 to 1.33) at the 2-year data cut. In the expanded population, 46 and 62 patients had lymphoma-related deaths in the Pola-R-CHP and R-CHOP arms, respectively. Exploratory analyses showed favorable 5-year survival rates with Pola-R-CHP in high-risk subgroups, including activated B-cell DLBCL and International Prognostic Index score 3-5. Long-term tolerability was similar between treatment arms. Findings confirm Pola-R-CHP represents a standard of care for frontline treatment of DLBCL.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morschhauser, F., Salles, G., Sehn, L. H., Herrera, A. F., Friedberg, J. W., Trněný, M., … Flowers, C. R. (2025). Five-Year Outcomes of the POLARIX Study Comparing Pola-R-CHP and R-CHOP in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 43(35), 3698–3705. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-00925

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free