Proximal versus distal adductor canal blocks for total knee arthroplasty: A protocol for randomized controlled trial

1Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background:Currently, there remains a paucity of literature about the efficiency of proximal adductor canal block (PACB) versus distal adductor canal block (DACB) for pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study is to perform a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficiency of PACB versus DACB for early postoperative pain treatment after TKA.Methods:This study is a 2-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial that is conducted at a single university hospital in China. Subjects presenting for unilateral TKA are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either a PACB or DACB group. The primary outcome of this noninferiority study is opioid consumption within the first 24hours following surgery. Secondary outcomes include quadriceps strength, pain scores, distance ambulated, and patient satisfaction. Continuous variables are compared using Student t test.Results:This clinical trial is expected to provide evidence of whether the PACB and DACB provide similar analgesia after TKA.Trial registration:This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5440).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Du, J., & Lin, X. (2020). Proximal versus distal adductor canal blocks for total knee arthroplasty: A protocol for randomized controlled trial. Medicine (United States), 99(22), E19995. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019995

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free