Assessing Weight Stigma Interventions: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

12Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose of Review: The primary goals of this pre-registered systematic review were to critically evaluate the existing randomized controlled trials targeting weight stigma/bias and identify promising avenues for future research. Recent Findings: Prior systematic reviews have highlighted intervention strategies such as shifting causal attributions of obesity, evoking empathy, deploying weight-inclusive approaches, increasing education, and combining these strategies. Here, we provide an updated systematic review of weight stigma interventions. Summary: A systematic search was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines and performed in PubMed/Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar until October 2024, yielding a final sample of 56 articles. In addition to previously established strategies, we identified several novel strategies, such as cognitive dissonance and connection building. Interventions can largely shift attitudinal outcomes, but future research should extend beyond attitude measures, assess weight bias over a longer term, and across more diverse populations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, C., Murley, W. D., Panda, S., Stiver, C. A., Garell, C. L., Moin, T., … Tomiyama, A. J. (2025, December 1). Assessing Weight Stigma Interventions: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Current Obesity Reports. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-025-00628-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free