Efficacy of thrombopoietin receptor agonists versus rituximab in non-responsive immune thrombocytopenia—A single centre retrospective analysis

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) beyond initial glucocorticoid therapy is challenging. In this retrospective single-centre cohort study, we compared all ITP patients relapsed or non-responsive to glucocorticoid therapy treated with either continuous TPO-RAs (n = 35) or rituximab induction (n = 20) between 2015 and 2022. While both groups showed high initial complete response rates (CR, 68.6 vs. 80.0%, ns), the overall rate of progression to the next therapy was higher after time-limited rituximab (75.0 vs. 42.9%), resulting in a lower relapse-free survival (median 16.6 vs. 25.8 months, log-rank; p < 0.05). We conclude that both treatments show similar initial efficacy and their ideal duration of therapy warrants further investigation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stolz, S. M., Schwotzer, R., Rösler, W., Hofer, K. D., Balabanov, S., Manz, M. G., & Rieger, M. J. (2024). Efficacy of thrombopoietin receptor agonists versus rituximab in non-responsive immune thrombocytopenia—A single centre retrospective analysis. British Journal of Haematology, 205(3), 1121–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19629

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free