Abstract
Due to the beginning of vaccination against COVID-19, serological discrimination between vaccine-associated humoral response and serology-based surveillance of natural SARS-CoV-2 infections as well as breakthrough infections becomes an issue of relevance. Here, we assessed the differentiated effects of the application of an RNA vaccine using SARS-CoV-2 spike protein epitopes on the results of both anti-spike protein–based serology (EUROIMMUN) and anti-nucleocapsid-based serology (VIROTECH). A total of 80 serum samples from vaccinees acquired at different time points after vaccination was assessed. While positive or borderline serological response in the anti-spike protein assay was observed for all samples (90% both IgG and IgA, 6.3% IgA only, 3.8% borderline IgG only), only a single case of a falsely positive IgM was observed for the anti-nucleocapsid assay as expected due to this assay’s specificity. Positive anti-spike protein antibodies were already de-tectable in the second week after the first dose of vaccination, with higher titers after the second dose of the vaccine. In conclusion, the combined application of anti-spike protein–based serology and anti-nucleocapsid-based serology will provide a useful option for the discrimination of vaccination response and natural infection.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Dörschug, A., Frickmann, H., Schwanbeck, J., Yilmaz, E., Mese, K., Hahn, A., … Zautner, A. E. (2021). Comparative assessment of sera from individuals after s-gene rna-based sars-cov-2 vaccination with spike-protein-based and nucleocapsid-based serological assays. Diagnostics, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030426
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.