Bilateral Nephroureterectomy Versus Unilateral Nephroureterectomy for Treating De Novo Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Renal Transplantation: A Comparison of Surgical and Oncological outcomes

7Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: There is currently no consensus on the optimal management of de novo unilateral upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in renal transplant recipients. We aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of simultaneous bilateral radical nephroureterectomy (SBRNU) and unilateral radical nephroureterectomy (URNU) to determine the appropriate surgical method. Methods: Patients who developed de novo UTUC after renal transplantation and underwent surgical treatment at our center were included in the study. Outcomes were compared between the SBRNU group (underwent bilateral RNU within 3 months) and the URNU group using the Mann–Whitney U-test for continuous variables, Pearson’s chi-square test for categorical variables, and the log-rank test for survival data. Results: A total of 48 patients were identified, including 21 and 27 patients in the SBRNU and URNU groups, respectively. Comparison of perioperative data showed that the SBRNU group had a significantly longer operative time (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, Q., Ma, R., Li, Y., Lu, M., Zhang, H., Qiu, M., … Ma, L. (2021). Bilateral Nephroureterectomy Versus Unilateral Nephroureterectomy for Treating De Novo Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Renal Transplantation: A Comparison of Surgical and Oncological outcomes. Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/11795549211035541

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free