Abstract
Experts and lay people alike can sometimes find it difficult to demarcate the absurd. Here I propose a set of criteria that may be helpful in achieving this in the realm of healthcare: falsifiability, plausibility and some hallmarks of pseudoscience. Applying this method is unlikely to be fool-proof but it might be a valuable aid in discriminating credible from incredible health claims.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Ernst, E. (2010, December). Winnowing the chaff of charlatanism from the wheat of science. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nen089
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free