Winnowing the chaff of charlatanism from the wheat of science

5Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Experts and lay people alike can sometimes find it difficult to demarcate the absurd. Here I propose a set of criteria that may be helpful in achieving this in the realm of healthcare: falsifiability, plausibility and some hallmarks of pseudoscience. Applying this method is unlikely to be fool-proof but it might be a valuable aid in discriminating credible from incredible health claims.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ernst, E. (2010, December). Winnowing the chaff of charlatanism from the wheat of science. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nen089

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free