Structural differences between two populations of articular cartilage proteoglycan aggregates

12Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To determine if articular cartilage contains structurally distinct populations of proteoglycan aggregates, we extracted and purified proteoglycans from canine knee cartilage under associative conditions. Equilibrium density gradient centrifugation separated three proteoglycan populations, on the basis of differences in sedimentation velocity, into groups of 21, 106, and 270 S. Electron microscopic examination showed that the 21 S samples contained free aggrecan molecules and clusters of aggrecan molecules, with a mean of five aggrecan molecules per cluster. The 106 and 270 S samples contained proteoglycan aggregates consisting of central hyaluronan filaments with multiple attached aggrecan molecules. The two populations of aggregates did not differ in mean aggrecan length or in the spacing of aggrecan molecules along the hyaluronan filaments, but the slower sedimenting aggregates (106 S) had significantly shorter hyaluronan filaments as measured by electron microscopy (mean hyaluronan length, 400 compared with 1,162 nm) and one‐third as many aggrecan molecules per aggregate (mean number of aggrecan molecules per aggregate, 15 compared with 44). This study shows that articular cartilage contains aggrecan clusters and two structurally distinct populations of proteoglycan aggregates. The differences between the two types of aggregate, in particular the number of aggrecan molecules per aggregate, may reflect differences in their assembly, stability, or turnover and give them different mechanical and biological properties. Copyright © 1994 The Orthopaedic Research Society

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buckwalter, J. A., Pita, J. C., Muller, F. J., & Nessler, J. (1994). Structural differences between two populations of articular cartilage proteoglycan aggregates. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 12(1), 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100120118

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free