Accuracy of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire and Work Assessment Triage Tool for selecting interventions in workers with spinal conditions

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate clinical decision support tools may help clinicians select appropriate interventions for patients with spinal conditions. The Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (ÖMPQ) is a screening questionnaire extensively studied as a predictive tool. The Work Assessment Triage Tool (WATT) is a clinical decision support tool developed to help select interventions for injured workers. OBJECTIVE: To compare the classification accuracy of the ÖMPQ and WATT to clinician recommendations for selecting interventions leading to a successful return to work in patients with spinal conditions. METHODS: A secondary analysis was undertaken of data from injured workers with spinal conditions assessed between 2013 and 2016. We considered it a success if the workers did not receive wage replacement benefits 30 days after assessment. Analysis included positive likelihood ratio (LR+) as an indicator of predictive accuracy. RESULTS: Within the database, 2,872 patients had complete data on the ÖMPQ, WATT, and clinician recommendations. At 30 days, the ÖMPQ was most accurate for identifying treatments that lead to successful outcomes with a LR+= 1.51 (95% Confidence Interval 1.26-1.82) compared to 1.05 (95% Confidence Interval 1.02-1.09) for clinicians, and 0.85 (95% Confidence Interval 0.79-0.91) for the WATT. CONCLUSIONS: All tool recommendations had poor accuracy, however the ÖMPQ demonstrated significantly better results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gergelé, E., Parent, E., & Gross, D. P. (2021). Accuracy of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire and Work Assessment Triage Tool for selecting interventions in workers with spinal conditions. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 34(3), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-200169

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free