Comparison of three methods of EPR retrospective dosimetry in watch glass

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article we present results of our follow-up studies of samples of watch glass obtained and examined within a framework of international intercomparison dosimetry project RENEB ILC 2021. We present three methods of dose reconstruction based on EPR measurements of these samples: calibration method (CM), added dose method (ADM) and added dose&heating method (ADHM). The study showed that the three methods of dose reconstruction gave reliable and similar results in 0.5–6.0 Gy dose range, with accuracy better than 10%. The ADHM is the only one applicable in a real scenario, when sample-specific background spectrum is not available; therefore, a positive verification of this method is important for future use of EPR dosimetry in glass in potential radiation accidents.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marciniak, A., Juniewicz, M., Ciesielski, B., Prawdzik-Dampc, A., & Karczewski, J. (2022). Comparison of three methods of EPR retrospective dosimetry in watch glass. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1063769

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free