Unlocking Octopus Export Potential in Indonesia: Logistics, Seasonality, and Certification Challenges from Bone Regency

1Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Indonesia’s expansive maritime territory and biodiversity position the country at the forefront of the global seafood trade, particularly in the octopus export market. This study assesses the export feasibility of octopuses through a case study of CV. Lintas Samudra Mandiri (LSM) in Bone Regency, South Sulawesi. Using a mixed-method approach— including literature review, field surveys, stakeholder interviews, and case analysis conducted throughout 2025—the study evaluates ecological conditions, species composition, harvesting practices, seasonal trends, and cold chain logistics. Findings show that Fisheries Management Area (WPP-RI) 713, where Bone is located, contributed 12.9% of Indonesia's total octopus production between 2021 and 2023, with growth exceeding 200%. Octopus cyanea is the dominant species, harvested mainly through traditional hook-and-line methods, while O. vulgaris appears only sporadically. LSM operates with a daily processing capacity of 8 tonnes and a cold storage capacity of 50 tonnes, supported by a network of 13 ports and compliance with HACCP and SKP certifications. The company primarily exports to Japan, benefiting from a reliable cold chain system and independent export licensing. Seasonal fluctuations in catch volumes, influenced by oceanographic dynamics, underscore the importance of adaptive fisheries management. Overall, the findings highlight Bone’s strategic role in Indonesia’s cephalopod sector and demonstrate the scalability of LSM’s integrated export model for other coastal regions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kasim, N., Budiyati, Saputra, A., Yusrizal, & Merdangga, T. D. T. (2025). Unlocking Octopus Export Potential in Indonesia: Logistics, Seasonality, and Certification Challenges from Bone Regency. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 29(5), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejabf.2025.411812.6365

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free