Augmenting advance care planning in poor prognosis cancer with a video decision aid

78Citations
Citations of this article
111Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The authors tested whether an educational video on the goals of care in advanced cancer (life-prolonging care, basic care, or comfort care) helped patients understand these goals and had an impact on their preferences for resuscitation. Methods: A survey of 80 patients with advanced cancer was conducted before and after they viewed an educational video. The outcomes of interest included changes in goals of care preference and knowledge and consistency of preferences with code status. Results: Before viewing the video, 10 patients (13%) preferred life-prolonging care, 24 patients (30%) preferred basic care, 29 patients (36%) preferred comfort care, and 17 patients (21%) were unsure. Preferences did not change after the video, when 9 patients (11%) chose life-prolonging care, 28 patients (35%) chose basic care, 29 patients (36%) chose comfort care, and, 14 patients (18%) were unsure (P =.28). Compared with baseline, after the video presentation, more patients did not want cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (71% vs 62%; P =.03) or ventilation (80% vs 67%; P =.008). Knowledge about goals of care and likelihood of resuscitation increased after the video (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Volandes, A. E., Levin, T. T., Slovin, S., Carvajal, R. D., O’Reilly, E. M., Keohan, M. L., … Noy, A. (2012). Augmenting advance care planning in poor prognosis cancer with a video decision aid. Cancer, 118(17), 4331–4338. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27423

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free