Abstract
The present study seeks to synthesize the scientific evidence from the last decade (2015–2025) regarding the transition from inequality in technological access toward social stratification mediated by automated decision-making systems. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and the SPIDER model, a corpus of 74 high-impact records from Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, and PsycINFO was examined. The results reveal an exponential growth in scientific production since 2018, marking a shift from infrastructure-based inequality toward a systemic stratification mediated by algorithmic opacity. Three critical sectors of exclusion are categorized: the socio-health nexus, the labor market, and the educational ecosystem. Methodologically, quantitative algorithmic auditing predominates (58%), although mixed sociotechnical approaches have increased by 25% since 2021 to capture experiences of intersectional vulnerability. The study concludes that AI acts as an active agent of social reproduction, necessitating a transition toward “Algorithmic Justice” and “Human-Centric Governance.” Finally, a “Reinstating AI” framework is proposed to democratize technological development and mitigate systemic biases, offering a roadmap for researchers and policymakers in the pursuit of technological sovereignty.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Mera Cedeño, M. J., Laínez Quinde, G. A., Zambrano Vélez, W. A., & Roldán Martínez, C. E. (2026, May 1). From the Digital Divide to Algorithmic Vulnerability: A Systematic Review of Social Stratification in the AI Era (2015–2025). Social Sciences. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15050326
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.