A meta-analysis of the effect of metacognitive instruction on mathematics achievement

5Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Integrating metacognition into mathematics education is crucial for improving students’ mathematical performance, problem-solving abilities, and attitudes toward mathematics. The objective of this meta-analysis is to examine the overall impact of metacognitive instruction on mathematics performance. We conducted a systematic review using the PRISMA guidelines, searching through databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest and Google Scholar. This yielded 43 studies involving 13,924 (experimental group, N = 7061; control group, N = 6863). We utilized R software packages to compute the effect size, employing standardized mean differences (SMD) and establishing 95% confidence intervals. Our findings demonstrate large and statistically significant effects of metacognitive instruction on mathematics achievement [ES = 1.11], metacognitive skills [ES = 1.18], and various other learning outcomes [ES = 1.27]. The results indicate that exploring this phenomenon could lead to notable enhancements in mathematics performance. These findings provide valuable insights for educators, informing them on how to optimize teaching methods and curriculum design to seamlessly integrate metacognitive instruction into mathematics education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hidayat, R., Mohd Saad, M. R., & Wewe, M. (2025). A meta-analysis of the effect of metacognitive instruction on mathematics achievement. Cogent Education. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2517510

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free