Consensus recommendations for the use of anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer

8Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In January 2010, a panel of Canadian oncologists with particular expertise in colorectal cancer (crc) gathered to develop a consensus guideline on the use of therapies against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in the management of metastatic CRC (MCRC). This paper uses a case-based approach to summarize the consensus recommendations developed during that meeting. These are the consensus recommendations: 1. Testing for the KRAS status of the tumour should be performed as soon as an EGFR inhibitor is being considered as an option for treatment. 2. Anti-EGFR therapies are not recommended for the treatment of patients with tumours showing mutated KRAS status. 3. For a patient with wild-type KRAS and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 0-2, whose mcrc has previously been treated with a fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin, switching to an EGFR inhibitor is a recommended strategy. 4. Cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab are all options for third-line therapy in patients with wild-type KRAS, provided that tolerability is acceptable. © 2010 Multimed Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cripps, C., Gill, S., Ahmed, S., Colwell, B., Dowden, S., Kennecke, H., … Wong, R. (2010). Consensus recommendations for the use of anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer. Current Oncology, 17(6), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v17i6.670

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free