Three different locations of a sentinel node highlight the importance of performing a sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer recurrence

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A local breast cancer recurrence or a new breast cancer in the previously treated breast is a staging challenge. Staging is important to tailor the local and the systemic treatment. Earlier treatment(s) can disrupt the primary lymphatic drainage. After the disruption, new lymphatic drainage path-ways are often created. The identification of these new pathways together with their sentinel node(s) (SN) is important for retreatment. A fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computerized tomography could be useful to identify the involved node(s), but, unfortunately, there is no evidence to support this. Ideally, in the case of a recurrence, an SN biopsy should be performed in order to identify the “new” draining lymph node(s). This new draining SN(s) can be located in unexpected places, and tumor invasion will lead to a change in the management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Albert, A., Huyghe, I., Stroobants, S., & Tjalma, W. A. A. (2015). Three different locations of a sentinel node highlight the importance of performing a sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer recurrence. Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research, 2016(10), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.4137/BCBCR.S30471

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free