Subacromial ultrasound guided or systemic steroid injection for rotator cuff disease: Randomised double blind study

137Citations
Citations of this article
220Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of ultrasound guided corticosteroid injection in the subacromial bursa with systemic corticosteroid injection in patients with rotator cuff disease. Design: Double blind randomised clinical trial. Setting: Outpatient clinic of a physical medicine and rehabilitation department in Oslo, Norway. Patients: 106 patients with rotator cuff disease lasting at least three months. Interventions: Ultrasound guided corticosteroid and lidocaine injection in the subacromial bursa and lidocaine injection in the gluteal region (local group); corticosteroid and lidocaine injection in the gluteal region and ultrasound guided lidocaine injection in the subacromial bursa (systemic group). Main outcome measures: Difference in improvement in the overall shoulder pain and disability index score after six weeks. Results: Six weeks after the intervention, the mean difference in improvement in overall shoulder pain and disability index score between the local group and the systemic group was -5.2 (95% confidence interval -13.9 to 3.5); it was -4.1 (?12.3 to 4.1, P=0.32) after adjustment for baseline score. A small but statistically significant difference in improvement between groups occurred in favour of the local group for two secondary outcome measures: the Western Ontario rotator cuff index (8.1, 0.7 to 15.6) and change in main complaint (2.0, 0 to 4). Conclusions: No important differences in short term outcomes were found between local ultrasound guided corticosteroid injection and systemic corticosteroid injection in rotator cuff disease. Trial registration: Clinical trials NCT00640575.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ekeberg, O. M., Bautz-Holter, E., Tveitå, E. K., Juel, N. G., Kvalheim, S., & Brox, J. I. (2009). Subacromial ultrasound guided or systemic steroid injection for rotator cuff disease: Randomised double blind study. BMJ (Online), 338(7689), 273–275. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a3112

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free