Blame avoidance, scapegoats and spin: Why Dutch politicians won’t evaluate ZBO-outcomes

  • van Thiel S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Despite high expectations about the results of agencification and a legal obligation to evaluate executive agencies, ministers and MPs seem not very interested in evaluating agencies’ results. Hood’s theory on blame avoidance is used to explain the lack of evaluation in the case of the Dutch ZBOs. Only one in seven ZBOs is evaluated as frequently as mandated. Findings show that ZBO evaluations are more an administrative than a political process. Reports do not offer hard evidence and are seldom used in parliamentary debates. There are no clear patterns as to which ZBOs are evaluated more, or less, often.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Thiel, S. (2022). Blame avoidance, scapegoats and spin: Why Dutch politicians won’t evaluate ZBO-outcomes. Public Policy and Administration, 37(4), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767211022490

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free