Evolution of dispersal polymorphism and local adaptation of dispersal distance in spatially structured landscapes

98Citations
Citations of this article
223Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many organisms show polymorphism in dispersal distance strategies. This variation is particularly ecological relevant if it encompasses a functional separation of short- (SDD) and long-distance dispersal (LDD). It remains, however, an open question whether both parts of the dispersal kernel are similarly affected by landscape related selection pressures. We implemented an individual-based model to analyze the evolution of dispersal traits in fractal landscapes that vary in the proportion of habitat and its spatial configuration. Individuals are parthenogenetic with dispersal distance determined by two alleles on each individual's genome: one allele coding for the probability of global dispersal and one allele coding for the variance σ of a Gaussian local dispersal with mean value zero. Simulations show that mean distances of local dispersal and the probability of global dispersal, increase with increasing habitat availability, but that changes in the habitat's spatial autocorrelation impose opposing selective pressure: local dispersal distances decrease and global dispersal probabilities increase with decreasing spatial autocorrelation of the available habitat. Local adaptation of local dispersal distance emerges in landscapes with less than 70% of clumped habitat. These results demonstrate that long and short distance dispersal evolve separately according to different properties of the landscape. The landscape structure may consequently largely affect the evolution of dispersal distance strategies and the level of dispersal polymorphism. © 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 Oikos.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bonte, D., Hovestadt, T., & Poethke, H. J. (2010). Evolution of dispersal polymorphism and local adaptation of dispersal distance in spatially structured landscapes. Oikos, 119(3), 560–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17943.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free