Complex Table Question Answering with Multiple Cells Recall Based on Extended Cell Semantic Matching

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Tables, as a form of structured or semi-structured data, are widely found in documents, reports, and data manuals. Table-based question answering (TableQA) plays a key role in table document analysis and understanding. Existing approaches to TableQA can be broadly categorized into content-matching methods and end-to-end generation methods based on encoder–decoder deep neural networks. Content-matching methods return one or more table cells as answers, thereby preserving the original data and making them more suitable for downstream tasks. End-to-end methods, especially those leveraging large language models (LLMs), have achieved strong performance on various benchmarks. However, the variability in LLM-generated expressions and their heavy reliance on prompt engineering limit their applicability where answer fidelity to the source table is critical. In this work, we propose CBCM (Cell-by-Cell semantic Matching), a fine-grained cell-level matching method that extends the traditional row- and column-matching paradigm to improve accuracy and applicability in TableQA. Furthermore, based on the public IM-TQA dataset, we construct a new benchmark, IM-TQA-X, specifically designed for the multi-row and multi-column cell recall task, a scenario underexplored in existing state-of-the-art content-matching methods. Experimental results show that CBCM improves overall accuracy by 2.5% over the latest row- and column-matching method RGCNRCI (Relational Graph Convolutional Networks based Row and Column Intersection), and boosts accuracy in the multi-row and multi-column recall task from 4.3% to 34%.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, H., & Shen, D. (2025). Complex Table Question Answering with Multiple Cells Recall Based on Extended Cell Semantic Matching. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc9100265

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free