Mass–elite differences in new democracies: Tunisia as a case study (2010–2016)

7Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article argues for inductive exploration of mass–elite differences in new democracies. Grounded in the “delegate model” of political representation, I do this by studying issue positions and issue salience of masses before turning to elites. The article demonstrates this approach using Tunisia, the only Arab democracy, by analysing survey data and originally coded party manifesto data. From an issue position perspective, the article uncovers mass–elite incongruence on the democratic–authoritarian and secular–Islamist political dimensions. From an issue salience lens, there is mass–elite congruence on the economic dimension. How mass–elite incongruence unfolds might affect the future of democracy in Tunisia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farag, M. (2020). Mass–elite differences in new democracies: Tunisia as a case study (2010–2016). European Political Science, 19(4), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-020-00274-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free