RESPONSIVE AND INCLUSIVE HEALTH GOVERNANCE THROUGH THE LENS OF RECOVERY CAPITAL: A Case Study Based on Gambling Treatment

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Criminalization of intimate partner violence is not serving its regulatory function. Restorative justice could help. Supplementing the criminal legal response to intimate partner violence with restorative regulatory strategies could increase the justice options available to people who have been harmed and foster community accountability for intimate partner violence. Moreover, employing restorative justice in some cases of intimate partner violence could free up an overburdened criminal legal system to focus on habitual offenders. Rather than continuing to single-mindedly pursue criminalization, anti-violence advocates should look to restorative justice both to develop a new theoretical frame for the response to intimate partner violence and to implement concrete policies and practices that could prompt the kind of culture change needed to effectively regulate intimate partner violence and create the space for justice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Best, D., & Musgrove, A. (2019). RESPONSIVE AND INCLUSIVE HEALTH GOVERNANCE THROUGH THE LENS OF RECOVERY CAPITAL: A Case Study Based on Gambling Treatment. In Restorative and Responsive Human Services (pp. 179–194). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429398704-12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free