Screening methods for gestational diabetes mellitus in Japan in 2018: a retrospective cohort study using a national surveillance questionnaire

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening methods and GDM incidences. In 2018, a national questionnaire was administered at 231 institutions (56.6%) of all 408 perinatal medical centers in Japan. Of 100,485 women, 2,982 (3.0%) were diagnosed with GDM during their first pregnancy period (FPP) and 7,289 (7.3%) were diagnosed with GDM during their middle pregnancy period (MPP). The proportion of women diagnosed with GDM during FPP and MPP using 95 mg/dL as the cutoff value (CV) for random plasma glucose (PG) at FPP (4.3% and 9.2%) was significantly higher than that of women diagnosed with GDM using 100 mg/dL as the CV for random PG (2.7% and 6.9%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Compared with women screened for GDM using “random PG and random PG,” women who were screened for GDM using “random PG and 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT)” had a significantly higher incidence of GDM (6.6% versus 8.9%, p < 0.0001). Using random PG and 50-g GCT, the incidence of GDM among women diagnosed at MPP using a CV of 95 mg/dL at FPP was significantly higher than that of women diagnosed using a CV of 100 mg/dL (16.5% versus 7.8%: p < 0.0001). While, using “random PG and random PG,” the incidences of GDM among women were similar between institutions using a CV of 100 mg/dL and those using a CV of 95 mg/dL at FPP (6.7% versus 6.9%: p = 0.3581). This study showed random PG as a first-step screening method in MPP may overlook women with GDM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morikawa, M., Sugiyama, T., Hiramatsu, Y., & Sagawa, N. (2022). Screening methods for gestational diabetes mellitus in Japan in 2018: a retrospective cohort study using a national surveillance questionnaire. Endocrine Journal, 69(11), 1313–1322. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ22-0072

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free