Porcine lungs perfused with three different flows using the 8-h open-atrium cellular ex vivo lung perfusion technique

5Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The number of lung transplantations is limited due to the shortage of donor lungs fulfilling the standard criteria. The ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) technique provides the ability of re-evaluating and potentially improving and treating marginal donor lungs. Accordingly, the technique has emerged as an essential tool to increase the much-needed donor lung pool. One of the major EVLP protocols, the Lund protocol, characterized by high pulmonary artery flow (100% of cardiac output [CO]), an open atrium, and a cellular perfusate, has demonstrated encouraging short-EVLP duration results. However, the potential of the longer EVLP duration of the protocol is yet to be investigated, a duration which is considered necessary to rescue more marginal donor lungs in future. This study aimed to achieve stable 8-h EVLP using an open-atrium cellular model with three different pulmonary artery flows in addition to determining the most optimal flow in terms of best lung performance, including lung electrolytes and least lung edema formation, perfusate and tissue inflammation, and histopathological changes, using the porcine model. EVLP was performed using a flow of either 40% (n = 6), 80% (n = 6), or 100% (n = 6) of CO. No flow rate demonstrated stable 8-h EVLP. Stable 2-h EVLP was observed in all three groups. Insignificant deterioration was observed in dynamic compliance, peak airway pressure, and oxygenation between the groups. Pulmonary vascular resistance increased significantly in the 40% group (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buttar, S. N., Møller-Sørensen, H., Perch, M., Kissow, H., Lilleør, T. N. B., Petersen, R. H., & Møller, C. H. (2024). Porcine lungs perfused with three different flows using the 8-h open-atrium cellular ex vivo lung perfusion technique. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1357182

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free