La ética de adam smith: Conciliando paradigmas, una propuesta olvidada

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In his Theory of Moral Sentiments, Adam Smith reconciles two moral paradigms that are usually considered incompatible: an ethics of virtue, with general guidelines and ideals of excellence, and an ethics with universal rules, which must be applied to all cases without exceptions. Smith makes this possible by shifting the perspective from which moral judgments are assessed to what I call the ‘sympathetic-impartial’ perspective, which stands for "the sympathetic feelings of an impartial and well-informed spectator". From this new standpoint, Smith is able to introduce some modern features into classic virtue ethics and provide a different justification for positive virtues, as well as to change the way ‘universal norms or principles’ are understood. Accordingly, Smith’s theory accounts simultaneously, and within the same theoretical framework, for both ancient-like virtues and their ideals of excellence and for modern-like universal imperatives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carrasco, M. A. (2016). La ética de adam smith: Conciliando paradigmas, una propuesta olvidada. Trans/Form/Acao, 39(3), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31732016000300003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free