Analyzing Political Trending Tweets for Opinion Extraction

  • Manikyamba* I
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Assessment mining once in a while additionally alluded as notion investigation, very well may be utilized for normal language preparing. By the assistance of supposition mining state of mind of open about any item or an individual can be followed. This procedure includes building a framework which gather and classify sentiments about an individual's notoriety. Disposition and sentiments of open can be followed utilizing a stubborn record by arranging it as either positive or negative as per the slant communicated in it. Traditional assumption examination frameworks face challenges like short length of content, spelling mistakes, Special tokens like URLs, emojis, diversity of substance, Different style of language, multilingual substance, slang words and so forth. Approach of opinion extraction depend on directed learning, or solo strategies (content pre-processing by expelling tokens, URLs, stop words). Following techniques were clarified for political assessment mining dependent on fame by utilizing three characterization calculations i.e., Multi Naive Bayes calculation depends on Naive Bayes hypothesis which utilizes contingent likelihood by tallying the recurrence of qualities and blends them in an informational collection, straight SVC and XGB classifier. Check vectorization is utilized to change the literary information into vectors, either by utilizing TF-IDF calculation or BOW. Extremity is determined via preparing the informational index and afterward resultant number of positive and negative slants can be determined. The Result will be determined dependent on these extremity esteems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manikyamba*, I. L., & Mohan, Dr. A. K. (2020). Analyzing Political Trending Tweets for Opinion Extraction. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(6), 2746–2752. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.f8197.038620

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free