Meta-analysis of management of colorectal anastomotic leakage

  • Shelygin Y
  • Nagudov M
  • Ponomarenko A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIM: To identify the most effective management of colorectal anastomosis failure via analysis of available literature sources. RESULTS: Systematic review included 20 original trials. Effectiveness of redo interventions for colorectal anastomosis failure including open, laparoscopic, minimally invasive techniques (transanal drainage, endoscopic vacuum therapy, endoscopic drainage) was described. Anastomotic failure rate was 6.5%. Medication was effective in 57% (95% CI 34-77%) of cases. Redo open surgery was applied in 43% (95% CI 23-66%) of patients. Postoperative mortality was 21-27%. Redo laparoscopic procedure was performed in 61% (95% CI 50-70%) of cases for anastomotic failure after previous laparoscopy, incidence of conversion was 12% (95% CI 4-28%). Transanal drainage was effective in 85% (95% CI 61-94%) of cases, endoscopic vacuum therapy - in 82% (95% CI 74-87%), healing of anastomosis without need for colostomy was achieved in 16% (95% CI 9-26%) of cases. Endoscopic clipping for colorectal anastomotic defect was effective in 73.3-77% of cases. CONCLUSION: Redo surgery for anastomotic failure is associated with advanced mortality and need for permanent colostomy. Laparoscopic approach reduces incidence of complications after redo surgery and followed by better functional outcomes. Minimally invasive procedures are advisable for colorectal anastomosis failure without need for redo surgery. However, effectiveness of these methods is controversial due to few reports and no comparative trials.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shelygin, Yu. A., Nagudov, M. A., Ponomarenko, A. A., Alekseev, M. V., Rybakov, E. G., Tarasov, M. A., & Achkasov, S. I. (2018). Meta-analysis of management of colorectal anastomotic leakage. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal Im. N.I. Pirogova, (8), 30. https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia201808230

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free