Nitrous oxide: Are we still in equipoise? A qualitative review of current controversies

45Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This review considers the current position of nitrous oxide in anaesthetic practice and balances potential beneficial and disadvantageous effects. The classic adverse characteristics of nitrous oxide, such as diffusion hypoxia, expansion of gasfilled spaces, and postoperative nausea and vomiting, are often cited as reasons to avoid this old drug. Recent concerns regarding neurotoxicity, adverse cardiovascular outcomes, and wound complications have further hardened many practitioners against nitrous oxide. New evidence and underpinning mechanistic data, however, suggest potential beneficial effects on the central nervous system, cardiovascular system, and acute and chronic pain. While we await the outcome of large studies including ENIGMA-II, many clinicians have already decided against this agent. The authors argue that this abandonment may be premature. © The Author [2013]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Vasconcellos, K., & Sneyd, J. R. (2013). Nitrous oxide: Are we still in equipoise? A qualitative review of current controversies. British Journal of Anaesthesia. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet215

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free