Prediction of outcomes of assisted reproduction treatment using the calcium ionophore-induced acrosome reaction

32Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Sperm concentration and motility are poor predictors of the outcome of intrauterine insemination (IUI), hysteroscopic intratubal insemination (HIT), or complete fertilization failure (CFF) in conventional IVF. We investigated whether the calcium ionophore-induced acrosome reaction (AR) constitutes an additional indicator of CFF and pregnancy that is independent of these semen parameters. Methods: Infertile couples with no female factor (n = 388) and women with tubal obstruction (n = 32) were studied: IVF (n = 133), ICSI (n = 72), HIT (n = 245) and IUI (n = 61). The percentage of acrosome-reacted sperm in relation to viable sperm was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curve and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to determine threshold values and the best predictor for CFF and pregnancy. Results: Threshold values of AR for predicting CFF in IVF and pregnancy in IVF and HIT + IUI were 21, 26 and 22% respectively. These values were independent of the conventional semen analysis parameters. CFF was lower (2 versus 20%; P < 0.01) and the pregnancy rate was higher (46 versus 24% P < 0.05) for those with AR >21% in IVF. CFF and pregnancy rate in ICSI did not differ according to AR. Pregnancy rate was higher for those with an AR > 22% for HIT + IUI (23 versus 11% P < 0.01). Conclusions: Ionophore-induced AR appears to be a useful indicator in addition to routine semen analysis for selection of patients for treatment with appropriate assisted reproduction procedure. © European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Katsuki, T., Hara, T., Ueda, K., Tanaka, J., & Ohama, K. (2005). Prediction of outcomes of assisted reproduction treatment using the calcium ionophore-induced acrosome reaction. Human Reproduction, 20(2), 469–475. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh636

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free