The impact of vocabulary enhancement activities on vocabulary acquisition and retention among male and female EFL learners in Iran

1Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In general, incidental vocabulary acquisition is represented as the "picking up" of new vocabularies when students are engaged in a variety of reading, listening, speaking, or writing activities. Research has shown when learners read extensively incidental vocabulary acquisition happens. Many EFLstudents cannotbe involved in reading activities in Iran. For involving students with more reading activitiesin EFLclassroom teaching and likening the resultsto the vocabulary exercises, the researcher directed a researchfor about five weeks in an EFLclass. The subjects were 120 male and female students at high school level. Half of them (RP group) read chosen passages after which they did different vocabulary activities and exercises. The other half (RO group) received the reading only (RO) treatment, i.e., they only read several reading texts. The significance of the present study lies in the fact that it was able to compare the effectiveness of reading only and reading plus vocabulary enhancement activities on types of immediate and delayed lexical word recall in a single study. The researcher employed the Vocabulary Knowledge Scale to measure students' knowledge of 60 vocabulary items. The results showed that RP group gained better results than RO group on both acquisition and retention tests. This indicates that "Reading plus" method is more effective in increasing knowledge of vocabulary and long term retention in male and female EFL learners in Iran. © the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sharafi-Nejad, M., Raftari, S., Bijami, M., Khavari, Z., Ismail, S. A. M. M., & Eng, L. S. (2014). The impact of vocabulary enhancement activities on vocabulary acquisition and retention among male and female EFL learners in Iran. English Language Teaching, 7(4), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n4p126

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free