Nonopioid vs opioid analgesics after impacted third-molar extractions: The Opioid Analgesic Reduction Study randomized clinical trial

15Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Opioids are still being prescribed to manage acute postsurgical pain. Unnecessary opioid prescriptions can lead to addiction and death, as unused tablets are easily diverted. Methods: To determine whether combination nonopioid analgesics are at least as good as opioid analgesics, a multisite, double-blind, randomized, stratified, noninferiority comparative effectiveness trial was conducted, which examined patient-centered outcomes after impacted mandibular third-molar extraction surgery. Participants were randomized to receive 5 mg of hydrocodone with 300 mg of acetaminophen (opioid) or 400 mg of ibuprofen and 500 mg of acetaminophen (nonopioid). After an initial dose, analgesic was taken every 4 through 6 hours as needed for pain. Results: In this randomized multisite clinical trial (n = 1,815 adults), those not taking opioids experienced significantly less pain (numeric rating scale ranging from 0 [no pain] through 10 [worst pain imaginable]) for first day and night (mean difference, –0.70; 95% CI, –0.94 to –0.45; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feldman, C. A., Fredericks-Younger, J., Desjardins, P. J., Malmstrom, H., Miloro, M., Warburton, G., … Lu, S. E. (2025). Nonopioid vs opioid analgesics after impacted third-molar extractions: The Opioid Analgesic Reduction Study randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Dental Association, 156(2), 110-123.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2024.10.014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free