A double‐blind comparison of a novel indanone diuretic (MK‐196) with hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of essential hypertension.

8Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

1 The antihypertensive effect and tolerability of MK‐196 (10 mg and 15 mg daily) was compared to hydrochlorothiazide (HCT; 50 mg daily) in a 4‐ week multiclinic, double‐blind study involving 42 patients with mild to moderate, essential hypertension. 2 Both doses of MK‐196 were as effective and sometimes more effective than HCT in lowering standing and supine systolic and diastolic blood pressures. 3 HCT consistently brought about significant increases in serum uric acid and significant decreases in serum potassium; both doses of MK‐196 produced similar but less frequent and smaller changes in both of these parameters. 4 Both doses of MK‐196 brought about significant decreases in body weight at Weeks 3 and 4 of drug treatment. 5 Patients taking MK‐196 reported fewer adverse clinical reactions (10 mg = 15%; 15 mg = 13% than those taking HCT (21%). 6 MK‐196 may offer a therapeutic advantage over HCT as an antihypertensive agent for use in the treatment of mild to moderate, essential hypertension. 1979 The British Pharmacological Society

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilhelmsson, C., Vedin, J., Moerlin, C., Lund‐Johansen, P., Vorburger, C., Enenkel, W., … Tempero, K. (1979). A double‐blind comparison of a novel indanone diuretic (MK‐196) with hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of essential hypertension. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 8(3), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1979.tb01012.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free