Randomized trial of blunt-tipped versus cutting needles to reduce glove puncture during mass closure of the abdomen

41Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Eighty-five consecutive patients were randomized to undergo mass closure of the abdoment with no. 1 polydioxanone mounted on either a blunt-tipped (n = 46) or cutting (n = 39) needle. Gloves were changed before closure and tested for perforation afterwards using standard air or water techniques. Fourteen pairs of glvoes were punctured when using a cutting needle, and three pairs when a blunt-tipped needle was used. The majority of punctures were to the non-dominant glove. The surgeon was aware of the puncture in eight of the 14 instances involving a shapr needle and in one of the three involving a blunt-tipped needle. Blunt-tipped needles, while not eliminating the risk, significantly reduced the incidence of surgical glove puncture (P < 0.001, Fisher's exact test). The use of cutting needles for abdominal closure should be abandoned.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hartley, J. E., Ahmed, S., Milkins, R., Naylor, G., Monson, J. R. T., & Lee, P. W. R. (1996). Randomized trial of blunt-tipped versus cutting needles to reduce glove puncture during mass closure of the abdomen. British Journal of Surgery, 83(8), 1156–1157. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800830839

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free