Abstract
Eighty-five consecutive patients were randomized to undergo mass closure of the abdoment with no. 1 polydioxanone mounted on either a blunt-tipped (n = 46) or cutting (n = 39) needle. Gloves were changed before closure and tested for perforation afterwards using standard air or water techniques. Fourteen pairs of glvoes were punctured when using a cutting needle, and three pairs when a blunt-tipped needle was used. The majority of punctures were to the non-dominant glove. The surgeon was aware of the puncture in eight of the 14 instances involving a shapr needle and in one of the three involving a blunt-tipped needle. Blunt-tipped needles, while not eliminating the risk, significantly reduced the incidence of surgical glove puncture (P < 0.001, Fisher's exact test). The use of cutting needles for abdominal closure should be abandoned.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Hartley, J. E., Ahmed, S., Milkins, R., Naylor, G., Monson, J. R. T., & Lee, P. W. R. (1996). Randomized trial of blunt-tipped versus cutting needles to reduce glove puncture during mass closure of the abdomen. British Journal of Surgery, 83(8), 1156–1157. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800830839
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.