Cost-effectiveness of immediate versus postponed intervention for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: Planned secondary analysis of the POINTER trial

Michiel F.G. Francken; Lotte Boxhoorn; Sven M. Van Dijk; Janneke Van Grinsven; Robert C. Verdonk; Marja A. Boermeester; Thomas L. Bollen; Stefan A.W. Bouwense; Marco J. Bruno; Vincent C. Cappendijk; Peter Van Duijvendijk; Casper H.J. Van Eijck; Paul Fockens; Harry Van Goor; Muhammed Hadithi; Nora D.L. Hallensleben; Jan Willem Haveman; Maarten A.J.M. Jacobs; Jeroen M. Jansen; Marnix P.M. Kop; Krijn P. Van Lienden; Eric R. Manusama; J. Sven D. Mieog; I. Quintus Molenaar; Vincent B. Nieuwenhuijs; Alexander C. Poen; Jan Werner Poley; Marcel Van De Poll; Rutger Quispel; Tessa E.H. Römkens; Matthijs P. Schwartz; Tom C. Seerden; Martijn W.J. Stommel; Jan Willem A. Straathof; Hester C. Timmerhuis; Niels G. Venneman; Rogier P. Voermans; Wim Van De Vrie; Hjalmar C. Van Santvoort; Marc G. Besselink; Marcel G.W. Dijkgraaf

Journal ArticleOPEN ACCESS

Cost-effectiveness of immediate versus postponed intervention for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: Planned secondary analysis of the POINTER trial

British Journal of Surgery (2025) 112(4)

DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf071

0Citations

4Readers

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Francken, M. F. G., Boxhoorn, L., Van Dijk, S. M., Van Grinsven, J., Verdonk, R. C., Boermeester, M. A., … Dijkgraaf, M. G. W. (2025). Cost-effectiveness of immediate versus postponed intervention for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: Planned secondary analysis of the POINTER trial. British Journal of Surgery, 112(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf071

Cost-effectiveness of immediate versus postponed intervention for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: Planned secondary analysis of the POINTER trial

Cite

Register to see more suggestions