Assessing the nonconservative fluvial fluxes of dissolved organic carbon in North America

62Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Fluvial transport of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is an important link in the global carbon cycle. Previous studies largely increased our knowledge of fluvial exports of carbon to the marine system, but considerable uncertainty remains about in-stream/in-river losses of organic carbon. This study presents an empirical method to assess the nonconservative behavior of fluvial DOC at continental scale. An empirical DOC flux model was trained on two different subsets of training catchments, one with catchments smaller than 2,000 km 2 (n = 246, avg. 494 km 2) and one with catchments larger than 2,000 km 2 (n = 207, avg. 26,525 km 2). A variety of potential predictors and controlling factors of fluvial DOC fluxes is discussed. The predictors retained for the final DOC flux models are runoff, slope gradient, land cover, and areal proportions of wetlands. According to the spatially explicit extrapolation of the models, in North America south of 60°N, the total fluvial DOC flux from small catchments (25.8 Mt C a -1, std. err.: 12%) is higher than that from large catchments (19.9 Mt C a -1, std. err.: 10%), giving a total DOC loss of 5.9 Mt C a -1 (std. err.: 78%). As DOC losses in headwaters are not represented in this budget, the estimated DOC loss is rather a minimum value for the total DOC loss within the fluvial network. Copyright © 2012 by the American Geophysical Union.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lauerwald, R., Hartmann, J., Ludwig, W., & Moosdorf, N. (2012). Assessing the nonconservative fluvial fluxes of dissolved organic carbon in North America. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 117(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JG001820

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free