Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Gender Invariance of the Coping Strategies Inventory in Academic University Stress

1Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Though the Spanish version of the Coping Strategies Inventory (CSI) is frequently used, it has not been subjected to any significant re-evaluation from a psychometric perspective. Method: We analysed CSI data that was focused on an academic stress situation, using a university sample of 874 participants, 50% of each gender. We conducted reliability, confirmatory factor, and factorial invariance across gender analyses. Results: The first-order factorial structure was confirmed, showing an adequate fit for the eight-factor coping strategies model with good reliability indices. Neither the second-order (problem-centred vs. emotion-centred) nor third-order (engagement vs. disengagement) strategies showed an adequate fit. Factorial invariance for gender was confirmed. Conclusions: The theoretical and applied implications of the results are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

García-Jiménez, M., Trigo, M. E., Varo, C., Aires-González, M. M., & Cano-García, F. J. (2024). Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Gender Invariance of the Coping Strategies Inventory in Academic University Stress. Clinica y Salud, 35(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.5093/clysa2024a6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free