Single-shot vaccines against bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV): Comparative evaluation of long-term protection after immunization in the presence of brsv-specific maternal antibodies

9Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The induction of long-lasting clinical and virological protection is needed for a successful vaccination program against the bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV). In this study, calves with BRSV-specific maternally derived antibodies were vaccinated once, either with (i) a BRSV pre-fusion protein (PreF) and MontanideTM ISA61 VG (ISA61, n = 6), (ii) BRSV lacking the SH gene (DSHrBRSV, n = 6), (iii) a commercial vaccine (CV, n = 6), or were injected with ISA61 alone (n = 6). All calves were challenged with BRSV 92 days later and were euthanized 13 days post-infection. Based on clinical, pathological, and proteomic data, all vaccines appeared safe. Compared to the controls, PreF induced the most significant clinical and virological protection post-challenge, followed by DSHrBRSV and CV, whereas the protection of PreF-vaccinated calves was correlated with BRSVspecific serum immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibody responses 84 days post-vaccination, and the IgG antibody titers of DSHrBRSV- and CV-vaccinated calves did not differ from the controls on this day. Nevertheless, strong anamnestic BRSV- and PreF-specific IgG responses occurred in calves vaccinated with either of the vaccines, following a BRSV challenge. In conclusion, PreF and DSHrBRSV are two efficient one-shot candidate vaccines. By inducing a protection for at least three months, they could potentially improve the control of BRSV in calves.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Valarcher, J. F., Hägglund, S., Näslund, K., Jouneau, L., Malmström, E., Boulesteix, O., … Riffault, S. (2021). Single-shot vaccines against bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV): Comparative evaluation of long-term protection after immunization in the presence of brsv-specific maternal antibodies. Vaccines, 9(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9030236

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free