Food choice, energy balance and its determinants: Views of human behaviour in economics and psychology

24Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper shows how economic and psychological approaches to explaining why people overeat are based on different basic assumptions about human behaviour. Three such views of human behaviour are distinguished: rational behaviour, reasoned behaviour, and automatic behaviour. Economic approaches, trying to explain behaviour leading to weight gain and obesity based on the assumption of rational utility-maximising behaviour, are contrasted with psychological approaches built on the softer assumption of reasoned behaviour and the more drastic assumption that major parts of especially eating behaviour are subject to automatic reactions to environmental stimuli. It is concluded that only the three approaches taken together can give sufficient insight into the various mechanisms determining food intake and physical activity, and that such a broad view is necessary for understanding the ways in which commonly advocated policy instruments can affect energy-related behaviour. © 2012 International Life Sciences Institute Europe.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grunert, K. G., Shepherd, R., Traill, W. B., & Wold, B. (2012, December). Food choice, energy balance and its determinants: Views of human behaviour in economics and psychology. Trends in Food Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2012.06.007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free