Association of flavoured cigar regulations with wholesale tobacco volumes in Canada: An interrupted time series analysis

12Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction This study examines the association of Federal Canadian regulations passed in 2009 addressing flavours (excluding menthol) in small cigars with changes in cigar sales. Methods Quarterly wholesale unit data as reported to Health Canada from 2001 through 2016 were analysed using interrupted time series analysis. Changes in sales of cigars with and without flavour descriptors were estimated. Analyses were seasonally adjusted. Changes in the flavour types were assessed over time. Results The Federal flavour regulations were associated with a reduction in the sales of flavoured cigars by 59 million units (95% CI -86.0 to -32.4). Increases in sales of cigars with descriptors other than flavours (eg, colour or other ambiguous terms) were observed (9.6 million increase (95% CI -1.3 to 20.5), but the overall level (decline of 49.6 million units (95% CI -73.5 to -25.8) and trend of sales of cigars (6.9 million units per quarter (95% CI -8.1 to -5.7)) declined following the ban. Sensitivity analysis showed that there was no substantial difference in effect over time comparing Ontario and British Columbia, suggesting that other provincial tobacco control legislation was not associated with the changes in levels. Analyses suggested that the level change was sensitive to the specification of the date. Conclusion This study demonstrates that flavour regulations have the potential to substantially impact tobacco sales. However, exemptions for certain flavours and product types may have reduced the effectiveness of the ban, indicating the need for comprehensive, well-designed regulations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chaiton, M. O., Schwartz, R., Tremblay, G., & Nugent, R. (2019). Association of flavoured cigar regulations with wholesale tobacco volumes in Canada: An interrupted time series analysis. Tobacco Control, 28(4), 457–461. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054255

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free