The first decade of post-communist elections and voting: What have we studied, and how have we studied it?

80Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This review assesses the state of the newly emerging field of the study of post-communist elections and voting by building and analyzing a database of 101 articles on the topic that have appeared in 16 leading academic journals (8 general political science journals and 8 post-communist area studies journals) between 1990 and 2000. The database is then used to make inferences concerning both what is being studied by scholars and how it is being studied. The review systematically assesses which countries have been analyzed, the types of elections examined, the prevalence of comparative analysis, the division between quantitative and qualitative research, and the types of data used in quantitative studies. It then turns to substantive questions, examining both how scholars have explained post-communist election results and voting decisions, and what they have used these elections to explain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tucker, J. A. (2002). The first decade of post-communist elections and voting: What have we studied, and how have we studied it? Annual Review of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.100201.102917

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free