Compensation as a duty of care: The case for "no fault"

4Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An optimal compensation system should compensate injuries when they occur, but also reduce errors and harm. The tort system used n most countries is increasingly anachronistic, and an obstacle to progress on patient safety. A "no fault" system of compensation such as that used in New Zealand may result in better quality of care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vincent, C. (2003). Compensation as a duty of care: The case for “no fault.” Quality and Safety in Health Care. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.4.240

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free