Comparing Performance of ANN and SVM Methods for Regional Flood Frequency Analysis in South-East Australia

20Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Design flood estimations at ungauged catchments are a challenging task in hydrology. Regional flood frequency analysis (RFFA) is widely used for this purpose. This paper develops artificial intelligence (AI)-based RFFA models (artificial neural networks (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM)) using data from 181 gauged catchments in South-East Australia. Based on an independent testing, it is found that the ANN method outperforms the SVM (the relative error values for the ANN model range 33–54% as compared to 37–64% for the SVM). The ANN and SVM models generate more accurate flood quantiles for smaller return periods; however, for higher return periods, both the methods present a higher estimation error. The results of this study will help to recommend new AI-based RFFA methods in Australia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zalnezhad, A., Rahman, A., Nasiri, N., Vafakhah, M., Samali, B., & Ahamed, F. (2022). Comparing Performance of ANN and SVM Methods for Regional Flood Frequency Analysis in South-East Australia. Water (Switzerland), 14(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/w14203323

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free