Abstract
Although, the operationalization of the autism spectrum disorder has been updated around two domains, the broad autism phenotype (BAP) one has not. Additionally, the items of the three common BAP measures, the Broad Autism Phenotype Questionnaire (BAPQ), the Autism Quotient, and the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), remain organized around a non-consensual number of factors. We explored whether the items of these measures matched with the two-domain operationalization through a parallel analysis, which has suggested two main components, and two expert judgments which have assessed item wording, relevance, and construct representativeness. A remaining pool of 48 BAP-relevant items suggested a possible under-representation of two subdomains. Despite the relevance of all the BAPQ items, only the SRS ones tapped in all subdomains.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Godoy-Giménez, M., González-Rodríguez, A., Cañadas, F., Estévez, A. F., & Sayans-Jiménez, P. (2022). Is it Possible to Assess the Two-Domain Definition of the Broad Autism Phenotype Using the Available Measurement Tools? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52(7), 2884–2895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05158-7
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.