Global health research, anthropology and realist enquiry methodological musings

1Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, I set out to capture the dynamics of two streams within the field of global health research: realist research and medical anthropology. I critically discuss the development of methodology and practice in realist health research in low-and middle-income countries against the background of anthropological practice in global health to make claims on why realist enquiry has taken a high flight. I argue that in order to provide a contribution to today’s complex global issues, we need to adopt a pragmatic stance and move past disciplinary silos: both methodologies have the potential to be well-suited to an analysis of deep layers of context and of key social mechanisms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Belle, S. (2019). Global health research, anthropology and realist enquiry methodological musings. Anthropology in Action, 26(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2019.260105

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free