Campus repertoires: interrogating semiotic assemblages, economy, and creativity

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Framed within the broader theoretical context of social semiotics, we attempt to show how university students communicate using a variety of unique means, in particular social contexts. We privilege Pennycook and Otsuji’s semiotic assemblages, Jimaima and Simungala’s semiotic creativity, and the notion of semiotic economy as critical ingredients that conspire to give rise to the unique and complex coinages and innovations constituting students’ repertoires. We argue that, born out of creativity, the students’ repertoires are semiotically and economically charged discourses that generate extended narratives such that more is realized with less. We show that this reality undoubtedly constitutes a multi-semiotic meaning-making endeavor that enacts and sustains students’ imagined and lived experiences in real sociocultural, historical, and political spaces in the multilingual landscapes of university campuses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Simungala, G., & Ndalama-Mtawali, D. (2024). Campus repertoires: interrogating semiotic assemblages, economy, and creativity. Semiotica, 2024(256), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free