‘What has Ghana Got That We Haven't?’ Party Politics and Anti-Colonialism in Botswana, 1960–66: A Response to James Kirby

3Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

This short piece is a response to James Kirby’s article entitled ‘“What has Ghana Got That We Haven't?” Party Politics and Anti-Colonialism in Botswana, 1960–66’. Contrary to Kirby, who is oblivious of the political economy of colonialism, and how this reality informed the decolonisation processes, we argue that the transfer of power in the Bechuanaland Protectorate was designed to preserve British economic interests under the pro-British Bechuanaland Democratic Party. The British were very uncomfortable with the radical Bechuanaland Peoples Party, whore rhetoric threatened core British interests, hence their preference and support for the Democratic Party.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lotshwao, K., & Maruatona, T. (2018, November 2). ‘What has Ghana Got That We Haven’t?’ Party Politics and Anti-Colonialism in Botswana, 1960–66: A Response to James Kirby. Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/03086534.2018.1539731

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free