Reevaluating the Ethical Issues in Porcine-to-Human Heart Xenotransplantation

24Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A major limiting factor with heart allotransplantation remains the availability of organs from deceased donors. Porcine heart xenotransplantation could serve as an alternative source of organs for patients with terminal heart failure. A first-in-human porcine xenotransplantation that occurred in January 2022 at the University of Maryland Medical Center provided an opportunity to examine several ethical issues to guide selection criteria for future xenotransplantation clinical trials. In this article, the authors, who are clinicians at UMMC, discuss the appropriate balancing of risks and benefits and the significance, if any, of clinical equipoise. The authors also review the alleged role of the psychosocial evaluation in identifying patients at an elevated risk of posttransplant noncompliance, and they consider how the evaluation's implementation might enhance inequities among diverse populations. The authors argue that, based on the principle of reciprocity, psychosocial criteria should be used, not to exclude patients, but instead to identify patients who need additional support. Finally, the authors discuss the requirements for and the proper assessment of informed and voluntary consent from patients being considered for xenotransplantation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silverman, H., & Odonkor, P. N. (2022). Reevaluating the Ethical Issues in Porcine-to-Human Heart Xenotransplantation. Hastings Center Report, 52(5), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1419

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free